University of Southern California
USC Center for Sustainable Cities



Research
Publications
Featured Publications
Academic Program Reports
Other Publications
Green Visions Plan Reports




USC College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences | USC Viterbi School of Engineering





USC Center for Sustainable Cities
Kaprielian Hall 416
University of Southern California
3620 S. Vermont Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0255

phone: (213) 821-1325
fax: (213) 740-9687
email: mphelan@usc.edu
Home About Us Academic Programs Research & Publications Business Outreach PERE News & Events Support Us

Featured News

Fiscal Consequences Of Concentrated Poverty In A Metropolitan Region

Does concentrated urban poverty have anything to do with urban sprawl? New research by Pascale Joassart-Marcelli (University of Massachusetts, Boston), Juliet Musso (USC, School of Policy, Planning and Development, and Jennifer Wolch (USC Geography/Center for Sustainable Cities) shows that because poverty makes cities more expensive to run, poor cities with limited fiscal capacity may be unable to compete for more affluent residents and businesses with better-off neighboring jurisdictions. Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation, Joassart-Marcelli and her colleagues analyzed the impact of poverty on both anti-poverty and general-purpose local public expenditure in southern Californian cities. The main purpose was to evaluate the extent to which high levels of poverty impose "uncompensated" costs to local governments - costs not covered by federal or state anti-poverty programs such as welfare or community development - thus raising costs for the provision of non-poverty related services. The team also sought to analyze the intrametropolitan geographical distribution of such costs.

Based on data from the past two decades, the analysis reveals that poverty concentration has a significant negative effect on the fiscal health of cities by not only increasing spending on antipoverty programs but also significantly raising the cost of providing public services such as police, fire protection, and other general government functions. Such heightened urban service delivery costs are typically uncompensated by federal and state fiscal policies that rarely take poverty into account in grant allocation formulas. Multivariate regression analyses suggest that poverty is one of the most important factors in influencing patterns of local public expenditures, after controlling for demographic, institutional, and fiscal characteristics of cities. Poor cities that experience significantly higher uncompensated costs and suffer from low fiscal capacity, face severe fiscal pressure forcing them to either cut services or raise revenues.This effectively maintains poverty and inequality within the southern California region, and fuels sprawl and the environmental degradation that comes with it.

To read more about this research, please download a copy of the report and maps.

back to publications

back to top

©2005 USC Center for sustainable Cities. All rights reserved.