
Hays is currently working on a book to be titled Girls Gone Wild: The Gendered Politics of Collegiate Sexual Etiquette.
Photo Credit: Irene Furtik
|
|
Feminisms Loose Ends
Streisand Professor explores paradoxes of womens lives
By Katherine Yungmee Kim
December 2005
Scholar Sharon Hays explores the unfinished business of feminism. The
culture, gender and family specialists published work, for example,
has dealt extensively with the conflict that arises when a woman is
expected to be ambitious and self-interested in the workplace, while
nurturing and selfless in the home. In other words, the paradox that
arises between competitive individualism and human ties of commitment
and obligation.
Hays has also explored some of feminisms unintended economic
consequences, such as how the greater equality of middle-class women
has come at the same time as increasing hardships for working-class and
poor women.
Formerly a professor of sociology and womens and
gender studies at the University of Virginia, Hays joined the sociology
department at USC College this fall. On Nov. 7, she was formally
installed as the third holder of the Barbra Streisand Professorship in
Contemporary Gender Studies.
We are very fortunate to have recruited Sharon
Hays, said Michael Messner, professor and chair of sociology. Her
award-winning books on the culture of motherhood, and on the impact of
welfare reform on poor mothers have established her as a star in
American sociology.
Messner said that her arrival also has solidified
the department as one of the very best in the fields of the sociology
of gender and the sociology of culture. This fall, Hays is teaching a
course on feminist theory, and in the spring of 2006 she will teach a
graduate seminar in the sociology of culture and an undergraduate
course titled, Gender, Sexuality, and Power.
Hays first book, The Cultural Contradictions of
Motherhood (Yale University Press, 1996), delved into the internal
tensions for working mothers in our culture, between the ideology of
intensive mothering the belief that a mother should focus all her
time, energy and money on raising children and the quest for economic
success, which requires a woman to focus all her time on the
individualistic pursuit of material wealth. For two years, she examined
the lives of 38 mothers from all class backgrounds. The book won the
American Sociological Association Culture Sections Distinguished Book
Award, among others, and has been translated into three languages.
Hays spent three years researching her second book,
the ethnographic study of welfare reform Flat Broke with Children
(Oxford University Press, 2003), in which she followed the lives of
both welfare recipients and their caseworkers. This book won the C.
Wright Mills Award from the Society for the Study of Social Problems
and the Phi Beta Kappa Award from the University of Virginia.
Hays describes herself as someone who studies
American popular culture. But I also study culture in the broadest
sense
the values and norms that affect how people behave.
Understanding the family, she adds, is crucial to understanding
American culture.
Her work links her to the many professors in the
sociology department who are currently working on family issues. Among
them are quantitative methodologists Tim Biblarz and his recent
research on gay and lesbian parents; Vern Bengtson and his
multi-generational study on family methods; Merril Silversteins focus
on grandparents roles in families; and Kelly Musick and her work on
marriage, childbearing and cohabitation.
Another new senior faculty hire, Lynne Casper, is
one of the top quantitative family researchers in the United States,
according to Messner. She also arrived in the fall, from a position at
the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development where she
directed the family and fertility research program and the training
program in population studies.
Hays bolsters the qualitative family researchers,
who also use ethnographic methods, such as Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo,
who has studied the use of paid domestic work in families, and Elaine
Bell Kaplan, who researches the experiences of African-American teen
mothers.
All of these faculty members explore social inequality and families in their work.
Messner said that vast changes within American
society, linked to shifting global relations, have led to these changes
in family relations. The idea of the family as a nuclear unit
consisting of a married male breadwinner and female homemaker/mother,
with two or three children, is an ideological construct, based in the
ideals of post-war middle class America, he explained. It is not the
statistical norm.
What we see today is not the family, but rather, an expanding array of families, he said.
Hays is currently working on a book to be titled
Girls Gone Wild: The Gendered Politics of Collegiate Sexual Etiquette.
She came to this topic perplexed by the glaring mismatch in the way
that young women present themselves professionally and sexually. Her
female college students were perfect representations of contemporary
gender equality independent, assertive, confident and competent but
then collegiate sexual etiquette seemed to require that they spend a
lot of time and energy applying make-up and slipping into sexy dresses,
jeans and shoes all with the aim of catching a man.
In the 60s and 70s, this sexual protocol was
widely recognized as detrimental to the goal of gender equality. So,
she said she asked herself, Whats going on here?
This behavior in young college women relates to
broader concerns of marriage and family. She said some conservative
scholars view the sexual hooking up culture on today's college
campuses as highly problematic in terms of the future of marriage, but
Hays sees it as a part of the complicated road to womens equality and
an important issue for todays young women.
It is a new world for young women, she said,
adding that there is no question that the ambivalence that young women
face between commitments to family and relationships and independence
in their professional life is connected to changes in sexual etiquette.
What are the possibilities for womens true
equality? she asked. We have come closer to it than ever seen in the
history of the world. Western women take the lead, but it has come with
a big package of problems that still need to be resolved.
|
 |
|